T
here are two spiritual dangers in not owning a farm. One is the danger of supposing that breakfast comes from the grocery, and the other that heat comes from the furnace.
Aldo Leopold

29 August 2005

Horse Power


It is true that horses inhabit our dreams, carrying us to safety or on wild adventures. Some of our dream horses fly, others have magical powers. Whatever our dreams of horses might be, they inhabit a universe of freedom and power. They also involve a lot of work, care and sacrifice. Horses and riders achieve great heights, some in jumping, some in dressage, some on endurance rides.

Horse riders also dwell in our dreams, as rescuers, vanquishers, and villains. Or as bearers of tidings, of good or ill. Why do we ride? Why does she ride, especially? The horse persists because of her, perhaps inspite of him and his combustion engines, which I have been led to believe by a certain yeoman lawyer I may have to part with soon. So will I ride? I fear the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak.

03 August 2005

�Right to Farm� and Addressing Farm/Neighbor Conflict

�Right to Farm� and Addressing Farm/Neighbor Conflict:
A Role for County Agriculture Enhancement Board

While working to create a Comprehensive Plan for the Towns of Fayette and Varick, we have had numerous discussions about Farm/Neighbor Conflicts, concentrated animal feeding operations, or, �CAFOs�, and the NYS �Right To Farm� laws. Recently we have begun to discuss smaller Animal feeding operations (AFOs). Early in 2005, I was appointed to the Seneca County Agriculture Enhancement Board (AEB), where I proposed that the AEB could potentially serve an important role as a liaison between the agriculture community, the public at large, and local municipalities who find themselves embroiled in sometimes heated Farm/Neighbor Conflict Issues. This notion received a relatively warm reception, qualified with reservations about what limitations NYS Right to Farm laws might place upon any proposed AEB role.

In late June, I was afforded an opportunity to pose a question to Ruth Moore, Deputy Commissioner, New York State Agriculture and Markets, at a conference entitled �Open Space and Farmland Conservation in New York State: Why is it important to your community? What tools will work in your community?� The question was:

�Due to strong Right to Farm Laws, there are limited options for municipalities to deal with community concerns over �CAFOs� that are perceived by some to be in conflict with other notions of what �Open Space� and �Farmland� are. What are ways to encourage farmland protection, without running into trouble with �mixed� feelings on �CAFO� sites and frustration over conflicts between farmers and their neighbors?�

The answer given by Ruth Moore was:

"We need to communicate to our communities both as government entities and as farmers what our farmers are doing to maintain good stewardship of that land. We do have an agricultural environmental management program that helps livestock operations in particular, to install best management practices on their farms to protect water and air quality. And our farmers by and large are doing a great job of that. There ha(ve) been some concerns raised about the larger livestock operations. I just want to emphasize that good environmental stewardship is basically size neutral. You can have a small farm that's not doing a good job and a large farm that's doing a wonderful job and vice versa. Its a matter of taking the tools that we have and what we've learned working with our land grant institutions on how to protect the water quality and air quality in our communities and really aggressively implementing that. We've spent $45 million in this state to help local governments, soil and water districts, work with our farmers to plan for best management practices and install those best management practices on their farms. And I applaud local communities that are committed to farmland protection in the face of sometimes neighbor concerns that -- and legitimate concerns - that they need to balance community concerns and the needs of our farmers to employ practices to run their businesses."

Though I appreciated the answer, I was as unclear as ever on what we could actually do.

I invited Bob Somers, Chief of NYS Agriculture and Markets Department�s Agricultural Protection Unit, to come to an AEB meeting, so that we could present our ideas and receive official guidance. We proposed to Mr. Summers that we could envision the Seneca County Agricultural Enhancement Board adding to its function a role of �acting as a �review and advise� body in cases where Town Planning Boards or other Town entities require further input.�

The discussion with Mr. Somers was quite useful. Prior to taking up the issue of the role of the county farmland protection board, or in the case of Seneca County, the Agriculture Enhancement Board, we discussed more generally what local municipalities could and could not do, in terms of regulating farms and farm practices.

According to Bob, the Department recognizes a local government�s right to regulate certain aspects of the storage and disposal of solid wastes within its geographic boundaries.[1] However, AML �305-a constrains local governments from enacting and administering laws that would unreasonably restrict farm operations within a county adopted, State certified agricultural district unless the locality can show a threat to the public health or safety. This is more than aesthetic preference. Districts are established to encourage the development and improvement of agricultural land. In general, the Department believes that local waste management laws should provide exemptions to allow the land application, storage, and/or composting of animal waste, recognizable and non-recognizable food waste, septage, sludge, and composted sludge, or products derived there from, for agricultural purposes on farm operations within a county adopted State certified agricultural district. Certain local permit requirements are reasonable, however, including, for example, submission of copies of Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) applications, materials and approvals to the local government; provisions for access to permitted sites and information on the activity (e.g., copies of information submitted to DEC to maintain a permit); and a reasonable permit fee.

As regards the role of the Agriculture Enhancement Board (AEB) and CAFO/AFO issues, Mr. Somers saw no problems with the concept of expanding the role of the AEB to include �review, advise, and recommendations� regarding municipality level CAFO/AFO issues. The county Board of Supervisors, who have created the AEB and staff it with appointments, can charge the AEB to assist towns or local governments in dealing with situations in which Right to Farm interests collide with other interests at the local level, especially CAFO /AFO issues. The proposed example of an issue arising at the town level which is contentious being referred by the town planning board, town zoning board of appeals, or Town Board to the County Agriculture Enhancement Board for review, advice, and comment, and then returned to town level for action (AEB comments would be non-binding, non-regulatory, and not directives- AEB comments would be considered studied opinions of county appointed agriculture practitioners, experts, and other agriculture stakeholders) was thought reasonable. The AEB would need to be clear in every case about the Right to Farm laws that are in effect, and also be clear that its opinions were not to be construed as directives for regulation.

The benefits of this approach to farm families and operations would be an added assurance that their projects and proposals were being considered by informed agriculture practitioners or stake holders. The benefit to community residents not involved in agriculture is that they would have an additional assurance of transparency, of the fact that decision making was occurring with the benefit of research, thought, and discussion by a body outside of the town, but with vested interests in the town�s well being. The benefit to town level officials and decision making bodies would be (1) the existence of a public process in which the pace of decisions was measured and predictable, thus reducing the likelihood of rushed decision making due to the power of emotional intensity of adversarial parties in a particular issue, (2) the ability to draw upon opinions of others who are familiar and experienced with the issues, which may buffer individuals and shift attention to decision making bodies and processes, and (3) the basic added value of open dialogue among multiple parties.

In light of this, I suggest that the Fayette and Varick Comprehensive Planning Commission consider the following for inclusion in the agriculture section:

1) the plan(s) should recommend that we institute reasonable local CAFO/AFO permit requirements including requirements for submission of copies of Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) applications, materials and approvals to the local planning boards; provisions for access to permitted sites and information on the activity (e.g., copies of information submitted to DEC to maintain a permit); and a reasonable permit fee.

2) The plan should encourage the county Board of Supervisors, who have created the AEB and staff it with appointments, to charge the AEB to assist towns or local governments in dealing with situations in which Right to Farm interests collide with other interests at the local level, especially CAFO /AFO issues.

3) The plan should describe a process by which planning boards and zoning boards of appeals can forward issues for comment, advice, review, etc to the County AEB.


[1] Environmental Conservation Law �27-0711, for example, allows localities to adopt local laws, ordinances or regulations which comply with at least the minimum applicable requirements set forth in the DEC�s solid waste disposal regulations. See also, Monroe-Livingston Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Town of Caledonia, 51 N.Y.2d 679, 683-684 (1980).

01 August 2005

Joint Effort to Protect Nation's Food and Agriculture Supply from Agroterrorism

Joint Effort to Protect Nation's Food and Agriculture Supply from Agroterrorism

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Department of Health and Human Services' Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) last week announced a new collaboration with states and private industry to protect the nation's food supply from terrorist threats. Four pilot visits will be conducted in September and October. The purpose of these visits is to assess and identify vulnerabilities in the agriculture and food sectors. Over the next year, teams of federal and state officials will travel to all 50 states to meet with all sectors of the food chain. Together, the federal, state and private industry partners will discuss security issues from farm-to-table and consider ways to better protect our food supply. Additional information about agrosecurity can be found on USDA's Web site at www.usda.gov/homelandsecurity; the FDA Web site at www.fda.gov/oc/opacom/hottopics/bioterrorism.html; and the DHS Web site at www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?theme=43&content=3802.

13 July 2005

E.B. White on 9/11

"The city, for the first time in its long history, is destructible. A single flight of planes no bigger than a wedge of geese can quickly end this island fantasy, burn the towers, crumble the bridges, turn the underground passages into lethal chambers, cremate the millions. The intimation of mortality is part of New York now; in the sounds of jets overhead, in the black headlines of the latest editions."

White, E.B. 1949. Here is New York. New York: Harper and Row.

27 June 2005

Education as National Security

An excerpt from: "A better tomorrow"
by Ehud Barak


(Reprinted from The Jerusalem Post, April 23, 1999)

�As the state enters its 52nd year, I wish to congratulate my fellow Israelis: Jews, Arabs, Druse, Circassians and Bedouins, new immigrants and those who inhabited this land for centuries. I wish all of us, first and foremost, peace and security. We were so close to fulfilling the dream of peace. The one goal that eludes us, the one goal that the founding fathers of Israel set but we failed to attain. "

"But peace and security should not, and cannot, be measured only in military or diplomatic terms. Investing more and expanding the definition of education is national security. Reducing unemployment is national security. Lowering the unacceptable and horrid poverty line figures is national security. Infrastructure is security.�

20 June 2005

CIA Goes Organic

Porter Goss, Head of CIA, is an organic farmer. In a bit of agricultural tongue-in-cheek, he complains about �pest training� in a recent interview with Time Magazine. Perhaps the answer to the US problem with �pests� lies in the spade, rather than the sword?

(TIME) YOU'RE INTO ORGANIC GARDENING. HOW DID THAT HAPPEN?
(Porter Goss) Mrs. Goss got a little horrified after she started reading the labels on some of the processed foods. We have a farm that [uses] no pesticides, no hormones, no additives--just compost and hard work. And we grow natural. I must say it's very rewarding to see. But the problem is, the critters take half of every plant. They're hard to sell. We haven't trained the critters yet which ones are theirs.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1074112,00.html

09 May 2005

Farm Bureau Membership Speech...Retrospective Upon Reaching Membership Goals

Farm Bureau Annual Meeting Membership Committee Report 2004

Good evening Ladies and Gentleman. My name is Keith Tidball. I am the Membership Committee chairperson this year and would like to share with you our progress to date. But first, a little about myself.

I am what you might call an Agriculture Bureaucrat, which means, I get paid to dream about being a real farmer when I grow up. I worked at USDA in Washington for a few years as a researcher and policy person. One of the things I �researched� while there is �where do I want to settle and raise my family?� I think I am an excellent researcher, and I chose Seneca County. I have been happy with my decision, and I think my family is too. We chose Seneca County because of its diverse agriculture, beautiful landscapes, temperate weather, affordable housing, and rural way of life. In important ways, our choice, and many peoples� choices to come to Seneca County, are a direct result of you the farming community of Seneca County, and of Seneca County Farm Bureau. The partnership of you and Farm Bureau has put Seneca County on the map in terms of agriculture, which relates directly to quality of life. But�

As I have noticed with my work on planning issues for the towns of Fayette and Varick, being noticeable on the map means both good and bad things. Things are changing around and in Seneca County. One only has to look at the average age of Farm Bureau members in this and surrounding counties to understand that things are changing. But change does not have to be a threat�change can be opportunity. Farm Bureau is uniquely positioned right now to be instrumental in shaping this agricultural community, how we will be in 10, 20, 30 years and longer. How? By being active, involved and informed. More than that though, we must be vibrant and relevant. That�s where Farm Bureau membership comes in.

Farm Bureau membership must be viewed as more than being part of the local ag club and a handful of discounts and benefits. It is that, but it must be more than that. Our county membership, we the members, must be an energized and informed body of community leaders, role models, and voters. We are that you say. Great! But can we be more of that? Yes, by turning out attention toward the younger generation. It is time to look toward the next generation of farmers, stewards of the land, rural landowners, and community leaders and help them understand the tools that they have at their disposal to ensure the future of farming and the rural way of life here. One of the most important tools they can have is Farm Bureau. So I ask each of you to help the Membership Committee in our efforts to recruit new members, lots of them, in addition to maintaining our current membership levels.

Hunters use your land? They are potential associate members of Farm Bureau�with the disappearance of farm land goes hunting and wildlife opportunities. Ask them.

Lease land from a landowner who does not farm? Their ag assessment is dependent on the health of agriculture in Seneca County�ask them about Farm Bureau membership.

The possibilities are endless�we just have to get creative about Farm Bureau, like so many of you are about farming.

The rest depends on you my friends. The ground work has been laid for us to have a banner year in terms of membership. Now, we must all get behind this effort . Please consider how you can support Farm Bureau membership efforts and let me or one of the other Membership committee members know your ideas. If every member speaks to one potential new member, we are assured of reaching our goals. If Farm Bureau is to be important, relevant, and influential here, WE THE MEMBERS must make Farm Bureau important and relevant. Like anything else, we can�t rely on anyone but ourselves. That�s how it is and how it should be. That�s why my family came here, because in Seneca County self reliance and independence aren�t against the law yet. So lets take control of our futures, staring with Farm Bureau membership.

I thank you all for this opportunity to serve Farm Bureau, and for all of your support thus far, and I look forward to growing here in Seneca County with you.

(Post script-Membership goals were achieved, including new member recruitment, as of May 1st, 2005)

14 April 2005

House Considers Agro-Terror

House Considers Agro-Terror, Food Supply Risks The U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security will fully consider the terrorist threat to U.S. food supplies as it develops legislation to effectively distribute funds to firefighters, emergency medical personnel, law enforcement, and other homeland security officials, said Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL), who chairs the Homeland Security Subcommittee on Management, Integration, and Oversight and also serves on the House Agriculture Committee, on 8 April. �The status quo simply does not serve our security needs,� Rogers said. �The first responder legislation� that was scheduled to be �introduced Tuesday will target funding where it can most effectively reduce the probability and consequence of terrorist attack, including the prevention and mitigation of attacks on our food supply. We must direct our resources at the greatest risks, accounting not just for population, but also for potential terrorist targets such as food supplies and agricultural resources in our rural areas as well.�

07 April 2005

CU's Garden Mosaics Program Takes Root, Renews Ties to Nature

CU's Garden Mosaics program takes root, renews ties to nature

Urban gardening activities, which are all part of a special kind of educational gardening program that connects children with elders, have taken root in more than 20 cities from coast to coast. It's proving so succesful in bringing generations and people from different cultural heritages together to investigate the connections among plants, people, and cultures in community gardens that it now has branches budding in places as far as South Africa. (For more on this story, see http://www.news.cornell.edu/Chronicle/05/4.7.05/Chron.html)

01 March 2005

Extension in Denial? Oh the Urbanity!

When Earnest E. Davis of Texas A & M University received the Lifetime Achievement Award from the Southern Agricultural Economics Association in 2002, he posed the following question as the title of his acceptance speech: �Will There Be a Cooperative Extension in the Future?� This question has been nagging people within the agricultural research, extension, and education community for quite some time now, in an era where, in the last decade for instance, it would be difficult to find even one or two states that have not cut their extension budgets. Extension support from state governments continues to lag behind the resources needed to conduct effective programming. In New York State, for example, significant budget cuts for extension seem to be looming, and these come on top of already lean times.

Also of interest, and again from Dr. Davis of Texas A&M, was a bit of information that sticks with me. Dr. Davis related a discussion that occurred in the Texas state legislature, at a hearing where the Texas Cooperative Extension Service was attempting to argue in favor of at least steady funding, if not increased funding. During this discussion, Texas Extension was challenged, or more accurately admonished, by the Honorable Pete Laney, himself a farmer, and the Speaker of the Texas House of Representatives. He said �If you want to continue to receive funds for extension programs in rural areas, you must convince the urban legislators that Extension is a valid investment for tax dollars. What I am telling you is that if you want to continue to have rural extension programs, you must have good urban programs.� I believe it would be foolish to dismiss this as a problem only common to Texas, in fact, I have personal experience that would indicate that this is a common problem throughout the US and possibly even the world.

So "Urbanity" is the locus of the power now. The implications for agriculture and natural resources management are profound, but is extension in denial?

24 February 2005

18 February 2005

Turkey Talk

The day after she left, I decided to check out a ridge where in the past she and I had spotted a huge gobbler and his merry companions. It was mid-morning, I was really on a tree planting mission, but since I had the Lil' Pardner 12 ga., some shells, and my Gobbler bag in the jeep, I decided what the hell. I peeked around the corner of the wood lot and there they were. Low-crawling to a tree-turned-fencepost, I hastily set up a decoy and began calling. I heard gobbling immediately. I was sitting in a small valley, in what was a natural funnel from my larger field into a smaller hay field. The gobbling was coming from over the little ridge, getting closer. In moments, as my heart rate increased, I saw one, then two, then three, then finally four huge turkey fans just over the ridge. They slowly advanced, like sails on the horizon. I already had my gun up, and began to be concerned that I might not be able to hold the position eternally. Finally, the fellow furthest left spotted my decoy and trotted a bit, then displayed mightily.

Two things then startled me. First, just to my left in the hedgerow I heard some hens. They were trying to move on an intercept path between the toms and the hen decoy. Its funny how one can recognize the siren call, even of species not your own. Second, out of nowhere, a fifth gobbler appeared. My spontaneous hunt suddenly became a surreal event. This gobbler was magnificent, huge, a red, white and blue miracle. He puffed up and took the wind out of the other four turkey's sails. His head was white, spooky, more goblin then gobbler. He was 30 yards, right at the crest of the ridge. He liked his options, he liked his role. The intercepting hens were alarming me, and this guy was taking my breath away.

I spent five minutes waiting for him to be clear of his companions, not wanting an overspray problem. But the hens were out-competing my deaf, dumb, mostly mute facsimile, my rubber decoy damsel. Then, as I feared, the turkey God began to slip behind the ridge! Still no shot and agonizing waiting...but finally he gobbled, his head briefly a solo and safe target. The ���Pardner��� rang out, that simple, elegant single shot 12 gauge...and missed. In a flurry the whole party flew to the end of the field. I hoped against hope that I had connected, but I sensed that I was low, my shot making a puff of dust at the ridge crest. I searched for feathers, searched for blood, then searched the woods where the fleeing flock flew, for three hours. Not a sign, but oh how I wanted to find a mound of feathers. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing but a sick sinking feeling and a new addiction. I hunt wild turkeys now. I don���t know what she does.

17 February 2005

Farm as Sanctuary

Not long ago I listened to a group of farmers discussing the problem of livestock agriculture getting a series of media "black eyes." As one might expect, the discussion resulted in clear no-nonsense consensus that something must be done. However, a less visible second outcome also became apparent. It seems that many in the agriculture community feel that agriculture is under siege. This sentiment is alarming to me, because as any former army trooper can attest, sieges are messy things. This is not to say that agriculture hasn���t taken more than its share of low blows in recent memory, or that some sectors within agriculture, and even some local farmers, haven���t taken it on the chin. One need only to look to Schuyler County���s most recent livestock burglary case to see that agriculture issues are increasingly becoming contentious, complex, and newsworthy. But is agriculture under siege? In a siege, nobody escapes untouched, and the casualties run high. Let us hope our important agricultural communities are not under siege. Rather, let us consider the possibility that agriculture, collectively, is being challenged, and that agriculture is up to the task. More importantly, let us join as communities to give our farmers sanctuary.
In rising to the challenge, agriculture, broadly speaking, must remember its collective competitive and comparative advantages as an industry and avoid internal fragmentation or being divided and conquered by those who would seek to gain by pitting one camp under the "Ag tent" against another. Who else can lay claim to such a market in terms of demand, where 100% of the population is a food consumer? The challenge for agriculture is to get away from the "Agriculture Under Siege" mentality, a reactive stance, while developing a more proactive self-image that emphasizes the agriculture community���s critical role as the provider of the safest, most secure and abundant food supply the world has ever known.
Rather than think of agriculture as an industry under attack, and I am not naç°¿ve to the realities of what is happening to farmers and the industry, our local agriculture businesses must capitalize on what they are, and what the public in fact wants them to be. They are farmers, or they support farmers. Family farmers who live on farms; bucolic, country havens of humans striving to live in harmony with nature. Farms that are indeed sanctuaries, not in name only or because they "rescue" the odd sick pig or lamb, but because they are where the animals are, where the soil is, where the tears and the toil translate into good food. Yes, the farm is a sanctuary. Sanctuary implies holiness, and that is appropriate because food is sacred, and its production is salvation. Land is sacred too, and farmers are stewards of the good green earth.
In today���s industrialized, technical, urbanized, rush-rush world of abstractions, the simple reality of the farm is the key. The farm is a powerful symbol, a comfort and an elixir for the fears of our edgy techno citizens. The symbol of the farm must not be hijacked by extremists who promote scientifically sketchy theories or who hold narrow philosophical views shared by only a minority. The phrase "Factory Farm" must be studied. Is it accurate? Oxymoronic? Appropriate? Whatever the verdict, we can agree that a successful farm is often a "Family Farm." A "Family Farm" should be the phrase we use, and it should be our symbol, our banner. With this in mind, it is important to safeguard the family farm, and protect whatever lies within its borders from those who would attempt to undermine or sabotage the efforts of farmers to continue producing our food. Equally important is the acknowledgment by farmers of their environmental responsibilities, and their continuing commitment to refining methods to leave our Finger Lakes farms better than we found them, for the next generation of producers and consumers, and for the creatures that share our fields and pastures.
A farmer is a symbol of strength, of security, of hard work, of the realization of dreams, of patience and perseverance, and of family values. These are the most American of ideals, and in our current state of heightened security and threat analysis, farmers and their farms have a unique opportunity to re-establish themselves as the every day heroes of food security. America���s quality farms, our farms right here in the Finger Lakes, and our committed farmers, are the best in the world, quietly and resolutely serving as The Vanguard of America���s Security. That is American agriculture's most powerful and positive message to the rest of America, and to the world. It bears repeating, our farms are sanctuaries. Let us think twice about allowing them to be defiled, or worse, disappear.

14 February 2005

National Ag Day and Community Planning

National Agriculture Day and Community Planning

The Town of Fayette, like many towns in New York's Finger Lakes region, is a farm town, and agriculture is the Town���s principal land use. Farmers and the business men and women who support farms are the backbone of the local economy. As National Agriculture Day approaches, it would do us all well to thank a farmer, for growing our food, for providing for our wildlife and natural resources, and for making our home in the Finger Lakes uniquely beautiful.

While we thank farmers, we should be thankful for farming, as an occupation, as a lifestyle, as an education, and even as a hobby. We should be glad for the soil, for the green that grows upon it and sustains us and the animals we consume. We should be grateful for the blood, sweat, and tears that have been spilled working the ground, for the thoughtful ingenuity that farming brought about, called Progress. And while we thank farmers, and are thankful for farming, let us also give thanks for land, for without land, it is difficult to farm, to be a farmer, or to benefit from and enjoy farming. As Will Rogers once said: ���Land--they ain���t making any more of it.���

In some places, land, farm land, is being lost completely and forever. In other places, the storm clouds of sprawl and unplanned development are just appearing on the horizon. Thankfully, farmers are planners, and in towns in the Finger Lakes like Fayette and Varick, the time to plan is now.

Farming, often a risk prone business, gets more difficult to sustain in areas that undergo rapid residential growth. Prime farmland, especially along or overlooking a lake, is highly developable and can be sold at prices that far exceed its agricultural value. For a struggling farmer, or any farmer with an eye towards retirement, the pressure to sell farmland for development is intense. Yet, when one farm goes, the neighboring farms have to deal with rising land prices and therefore rising taxes, additional development pressures, increasing conflicts with non-farm neighbors, and a general increase in the cost of doing business. As Washington County dairy farmer George Houser was quoted as saying, ���You lose agricultural land one house at a time.���

The American Farmland Trust���s recent ���Farming on the Edge��� study identified three critical farming areas in New York State that are currently threatened by non-farm development: the Hudson River Valley, Long Island, and Western New York-The Finger Lakes Region. Yet, despite the threat to our local food supply, our open space, and our rural ways of life here in the Finger Lakes, the reality is that farmers comprise less than one percent of the population in the State of New York. Therefore, it is critical that the citizens of small towns in the Finger Lakes, like the Town of Fayette, recognize that without farmers, there is no farmland. Quaint notions of ���working landscapes��� mean nothing if the landscape isn���t producing food and fiber. That takes farmers. On the other hand, it is equally important that farmers take responsibility for their farm���s future by engaging in thoughtful planning that goes beyond the outdated model of quick-sale major subdivision exit strategies. But how do we go about all of this?

The answer is planning. We must fearlessly pursue a solid plan, one that takes into account the concerns of the agricultural community, which in the end are all of our concerns. Farmers know that ���failing to plan is planning to fail.��� The farm community must not see town planning efforts and exercises as threats to their individual liberties, but as opportunities to protect the freedoms to farm for the next generation. There are examples in neighboring counties to follow, and tools for doing this.

In 1971, the State of New York enacted its Agriculture Districts law, which encourages farmers to join together and commit their lands to agricultural use in return for property tax relief and protection from outside intrusions. Nearly twenty years later, New York went a step further by passing the Agriculture Protection Act. This piece of legislation strengthened farmers��� right to farm, encouraged scrutiny of public projects that could negatively affect agriculture and initiated the development of county agricultural and farmland protection strategies. Since 1994, New York has been allotting funds for counties to develop plans, and in 1996, the state passed legislation to provide counties that have approved plans, or eligible municipalities, with the funding to purchase development rights to farmland.

Recently, New York State legislation has been proposed to use real estate transfer fees to preserve farm land and open space. Money invested in developing a town would then also generate revenue to help preserve it. To do this, however, the state Legislature must pass a special law giving towns permission to put the proposal before its voters. This legislation, called the Community Preservation Act, would give authority to all towns to choose to put a referendum before the voters. As part of this process, the Community Preservation Act would require a town to develop a Community Preservation Project Plan
that identifies the land to be preserved. This new idea merits consideration by the Town of Fayette and our neighbors in the Finger Lakes.

State level funding can make a huge difference, but farmland protection, the future of farming, must rely on the efforts of individuals in their own communities, in towns and villages. The Towns of Fayette and Varick in Seneca County are currently involved in town level comprehensive planning that, if done in an open, thoughtful, honest way, will no doubt benefit agriculture in the long run, while benefiting the rest of the community at the same time. The agriculture communities in these two respective towns have been invited to a third input meeting on farmland preservation issues and comprehensive planning on March 7th, 2005 at 7:00 PM at the new Fayette Fire Hall. There will surely be more meetings dealing with farming issues, in our towns and in neighboring towns, but will farmers attend? I know everyone that loves their rural town hopes so, because it is today���s farmers that will tell us whether or not farms will be part of our future. So as we approach National Agriculture Day, let us remember to give thanks, and let us be sure that we don���t lose what we love. Let us be sure that farms are a part of our future. Plan to enjoy farmland in the future. Get involved.

12 February 2005

Manual labor- Conscientious vs. Conscious

The manual does not describe, in its entirety, the way things work, in their entirety. -- TidRock

Conscience is first occupied in ascertaining our duty, before we proceed to action; then in judging of our actions when performed. -- J M Mason

The sweetest cordial we receive, at last,
is concience of our virtuous actions past. -- Denham

11 February 2005

Darkest Before Dawn Part I

There is little as dark as denial. To be denied is often to experience a darkness deeper than that before dawn. And if it is one's particularly sad misfortune to experience deep denial and deeper disappointment in those deepest dark moments before dawn; then, the darkness of denial is dark, dark indeed.

Such was my misfortune on fine starry October morning, an hour and a half before dawn. I was cheerfully relishing the final farm chores of the morning of my departure, putting the finishing touches on a masterful packing effort which included a canoe, a kennel and all accoutrements, duck decoys, assorted guns and ammunition, reading material and diary, and appropriate kit and clothing to live sportingly well in the north woods of Maine for a week of glorious game bird hunting. Grouse, woodcock, a variety of waterfowl, and various and sundry other small game awaited me in the great north woods, as well as a motley group of mildly academic, endearingly gourmand and erudite epicureans, most of whom are, like myself, "Johnny-come-lately-s" to hunting, which is to say, daddy didn't teach us when we were five years old; rather we became converts later in life, which explains the zealotry in all cases and on all counts. More on that subject shortly.

It should be said that there is nothing particularly wrong with hunting my home ground. I am blessed with the opportunity to temporarily occupy, hopefully for the next fifty years or so, an upstate New York farm in the Finger Lakes region that is a veritable cornucopia of wild game-- the waterfowl are plentiful, and the deer and turkey are seen daily crossing the old fields, inspecting dilapidated fence rows and pastures. Grouse and woodcock coverts are near as well. I love this ground more every day. But it isn't Maine. It isn't lumberjack land and you won't often have a bear or a moose flush you, just when you thought the feathered quarry you were after might take flight. No, Maine is different. The great north woods with their grand pines and elegant birches, the root beer stained creeks and lakes, the haunting call of the loon, and the knowledge that you are in wild country, wilderness, a bigger place, bigger than one's self, one's experience, one's control, is captivating. Plus, there are more acres and more grouse to hunt.

I planned to drive all day and hit Bangor in the late afternoon, refuel and make final supply acquisitions, and then head for the woods. If I made the gate after dark, I would camp just inside the gate and rendezvous with the rest of the group in the morning. If I made the gate before dark, I would pick a reasonable destination further in and camp there for the night. In either case, the point was to get rested and not get lost when I hit the good country. I checked my routes on my New York and Maine DeLorme Atlas and Gazateer maps, went through my final checks on my truck, loaded the dog and started down the gravel driveway to embark on my journey north. It was 5:00 AM. I turned on my turn signal and habitually glanced at the dash to ensure that the blinker was working, and then glanced at the clock. Most times, when I look at the blue LED digits on the dash clock, I am late or almost late for something. Or at a minimum, there is some kind of work, family, farm, or other pressure. On this morning, I looked at the clock and breathed that sigh of abandon, of letting go, of Vacation.

But then I remembered that it wasn't really vacation, but rather vaguely described "away-ness" due to the fact that I had just started a new job. My boss was in France, and I was newly at the helm of the boss's favorite ship, a big high profile project. A twinge of guilt hit me as I pulled out of the driveway. Was I neglecting my duties by taking off for a hunting trip in my first week on the job? I accelerated, passively noticing the lake in front of my eastern pasture. Some deer stood in the ditch, their eyes glowing at me like distant stadium lights. I slowed down, they froze for a moment, nervously flicked tails and ears, and then bolted. I pulled into the drive to the pasture, to the little side road to the marsh, to my duck blind. It was 5:04 AM. The deer were cruising the hedgerow, now, in full flight and heading for the road. Just a matter of luck whether or not one gets smacked crossing there, I thought to myself. They don't know any better, can't really reason about consequences, live in the constant Now, which is good until you get smacked. 5:06 AM. But, we humans, I thought, we can anticipate consequences, like what happens to one's ability to pay a mortgage payment after one loses a job due to a predilection for hunting in Maine during the first week on said job.

At 5:10 AM I was starring at my computer screen in disbelief. The truck was still idling outside, Bob Dylan in the CD player for the drive, dog settling in for a long nap. The boss, hours ahead of me in France, had a list as long as my arm of things that were critical, must get done in the next four days, and required constant communication. Could I rearrange my schedule and handle these items? Just like that. Darkness. Deep, dark, dreaded denial and disappointment. A hole in the universe had yawned open and I, the flannel clad Voyageur heading to the Great White North and Aurora Borealis, was the sole benefactor of the absolute absence of light.

I spent the next few days reacquainting myself with my old friend depression. I alternated between treatments of St. John's Wort and Scotch whiskey. I tried in vain to contact the awaiting hunting party in Maine, to alert them of my misfortune, and to allay their fears that I may have met my end in a moose brothel. But to no avail. I was alone in my sorrow, and the full eclipse of a hunting trip denied was upon me. Darkness.

This was familiar ground, this trip of a lifetime being taken away. When I was a young boy, my father and I planned a week long fishing trip to Wisconsin. I looked at all of the magazines and drooled over the fish being hauled out of these pristine northern waters. In those days, cold water fish were cool. Big walleye and Northern Pike were worth driving for. Now its all Bass and warm water and worms, plastic or otherwise. I'll take a Daredevil and a toothy critter any day. Unfortunately, one afternoon only days before the big trip, I was the daredevil, taking the dare to play some boyish prank on my very girlish sister. It was a huge success in prankish boy terms, which meant my sister went immediately crying to a parental type. I of course admitted nothing, denied everything, and demanded proof, which was served up to me by a none-to-impressed neighbor. Busted. Mom was incensed, and since the prank involved worms, and so did fishing as far as she was concerned, the logical leap to cancellation of The Trip was an easy one. Darkness. I learned well the meaning of consequences, and later, grace and mercy, as my father found a way to plead my case and reduce my sentence to being grounded for 20 weeks so that I could go fishing with him. And we did catch those big up north fish.

But there was to be no silver lining, no merciful stay of sentence, in my dark cloud of denied wilderness this time. I was done for. Maine was out. I tried to salve my wounds with a duck hunt, but it was too warm, and all the ducks went to the guys with the gadgets and gizmos. I tried a grouse hunt in a newly discovered covert but saw few birds and missed all of them. Sunday came, and the first few emails and phone calls began to trickle in- was I ok? Alive? Lost in Maine? What had happened? I pounded out my mea culpa on the keyboard, sealed it with a kiss, and expected to be razzed to no end.

End part one

10 February 2005

Weathermen...9/11 Commission musings (dated)

We are all watching. We are passive observers of a political tornado that is sucking up everything dear to us and depositing it again in different places, twisted, looking almost unfamiliar. But we are not participating, not acting now. We are watching the weather, but most of us are not out in it. We are relying on the WeatherMen...but has that ever been a good idea?

In the convergence, or collision, of two "weather systems," the 9/11 Commission proceedings and continuing difficulties in Iraq, things are really getting intense. The accusations, the implications, currently being leveled at the Bush administration are framed in such a way as to be transparently political, and to suggest mistruth. The administration is caught between calls to (1)admit mistruths, which then would defeat any efforts the Bush administration makes to distinguish itself from previous administrations, and/or (2) admit mistakes, admissions that would help make the case for follow on arguments implying incompetence, which must lead to firings, a politically disruptive ploy. Severe storm warnings in effect.

The secret for the Bush administration to weather the storm may be to resist self-defensive arrogance and to admit humanity. I wouldn't advocate admitting failure. That���s too strong. I would advocate admitting to misjudging certain things, and would admit to being a victim of circumstances, including unacceptable delays in getting key personnel into position after the election fiasco. I would admit missteps along the way. I would also make sure to point out that this business of fighting terrorism is not black and white, not "go or no-go," not pass or fail, at least not in the sense of the business of a nation. Its much more like climbing a mountain. A misstep, even a fall, is not necessarily failing to climb the mountain. It is a misstep, a setback of varying degrees and implications, depending upon its severity. Certainly, anybody that sets out to climb knows that some missteps can be grave, even fatal. They also know that perfection is a myth when climbing mountains, and that there will be unforeseen challenges to overcome. But if the unrealistic pressure of the possibility of a misstep causing the entire effort of climbing a mountain to be judged as "failure" is allowed to fester, then it is unlikely that one would dare to climb the mountain at all.

The United States of America can not afford to be afraid to weather storms or to climb mountains...if we succumb to fear of missteps in our efforts to reach the summit, to accomplish our goals of liberty and justice for all, then the terrorists have indeed scored a victory. I would say that failure is the same as defeat, and no American has been defeated, in the past, now, or in the future, by whatever threat or enemy, if they were engaged in a fight for truth, justice, and liberty. Yes, to the families of the victims of 9/11, the fact is, we could have and should have done a better job of preventing the terrible tragedy, the most costly misstep in recent memory. But we should be careful not to sully the memory of the many men and women who died on that day and since, by saying that their deaths were part of a "failure." We should resist efforts to politicize tragedy and responses to it. We should be wary of bringing dishonor upon the many leaders at every level of government and law enforcement in this country, from any political party, who are putting immense effort into correcting the causes of this costly misstep and focusing with renewed vigor on the summit. And I would say to the commission, do not dishonor yourselves, as Americans, by allowing the enemy to sow the seeds of discord, deceit, and division amongst us. The blame for 9/11 lies squarely, squarely, on the evil men who brought terror to our families. The burden for the aftermath lies upon every American. We should not be asking who is to blame now, we should be asking how we can emerge from this stronger and wiser than before, and what we as citizens can do for our country. Sound familiar?

28 January 2005

Frankiln

Benjamin Franklin's Goals of Virtue

Temperance : Eat not to dullness; drink not to elevation.

Silence : Speak not but what may benefit others or yourself; avoid trifling conversation.

Order : Let all your things have their places; let each part of your business have its time.

Resolution : Resolve to perform what you ought; perform without fail what you resolve.

Frugality : Make no expense but to do good to others or yourself; that is, waste nothing.

Industry : Lose no time; be always employed in something useful; cut off all unnecessary actions.

Sincerity : Use no hurtful deceit; think innocently and justly; speak accordingly.

Justice : Wrong none by doing injuries; or omitting the benefits that are your duty.

Moderation : Avoid extremes; forebear resenting injuries so much as you think deserve.

Cleanliness : Tolerate no uncleanliness in body, clothes, or habitation.

Tranquility : Be not disturbed at trifles or at accidents common or unavoidable.

Chastity : Rarely use venery but for health or offspring, never to dullness, weakness, or the injury of your own or another's peace or reputation.

Humility : Imitate Jesus and Socrates.

14 January 2005


Fiona & Spencer

12 January 2005

Last day of waterfowl

The morning of the last day of the waterfowl season went well in the geese fields, but as there were still dekes in the water in front of my blind, we decided to finish the season at the marsh, with Fiona, who sat out the morning field hunt. And it was at it should be. Within minutes of being in the blind, a flock of three black ducks buzzed us, but I was in the water cleaning the snow off of the diver dekes. Still, Mike's calling got them to within 60 yards coming straight in before they spied me in the spread and flared out of the county.

We saw a few more ducks way out in the lake, called a bit, reminisced about our favorite memories of the year's waterfowling, and agreed that it had been a magnificent season. We decided to stay until dark, close it out right. We tallied up Fiona's retrieves, and counted 119 on the board. Of course, we resolved to get her to 120, as if it mattered to her. Forty -five minutes later we were running out of light with no real prospects for getting another duck for the Queen of Canoga. I began to look at my watch, noticing lights flickering, winking on across the lake. We were losing light fast, and then from the north a solo black duck appeared in the middle, angling south to the mouth of the creek. I jumped on him with the timber call, and Mike backed me up with some sweet chuckles and we turned him on a dime. He came straight into the spread but looked like he was going to hang up right at fifty yards. He actually got to forty five before back pedaling and I called "Take-em!" to Jim, who hit him hard, solo, with the first shot just as the duck sat down, followed by a solid second tap on the water for good measure.

We were rejoicing. Last bird, a black duck, in fading light, Fiona's 120th retrieve, and so on. Leisurely walking from the blind to the shoreline to savor watching Fiona work the bird, I was shocked to see the bird attempt to fly away, after laying there ���dead��� for 30 seconds or better. The duck flapped about, got upright and began a ���swim and evade��� game with Fiona. Our Queen of Canoga stayed with her mark though, until the bird dove. By this time Jim and I were wading far out from shore, guns in hand, but reluctant to shoot too near Fiona. The bird dove over and over again, never coming up where expected. Each time the duck surfaced, I would give Fiona a new mark and she would be after it. I was feeling that sick feeling of losing a bird in the fading light and choppy waters, a terrible way to end the season. But the duck made a fatal error on one dive, and popped up closer to shore. Fiona did the geometry, anticipated the next dive and cut off the bird���s escape route. When she got the grip, she looked as if she would never let go.

So Fiona saved the day. Fiona ended our season in fine style. I saw her in her tenth year retrieve a bird in grand style, showing guts and brains both, like the 119 before, but better. I saw the decoys bobbing in her wake, silhouetted against the dusk. I saw her tail wagging in the water. I saw my friends around me and the birds flying still, south. I saw the wind on the water. And it was as it should be. Amen.

02 January 2005

So this it...get it?

There is only one thing worse than diving in...and that is thinking about diving in.

But someone's saying something....something's being said.
I can't see you, but I know you're here.
So I've skipped the introductions, and the broadway play. I'm mixing in the stuff of alchemy; politics, personhood, and the pursuit of potpouri. The message is the mix. Get it?